Biomarkers for Research & Medical Diagnostics
Welcome to METABOLIC SOLUTIONS INC.
 
Gastric Motility
Introduction
Background
Validation
Advantages
Publications
 
Search for:
 
 

Gastric Motility Breath Test Validation


Binding of Tracer to Muffin

The amount of tracer remaining associated with the muffin meal after incubation in gastric fluid has been determined to be greater than 95%.  These in vitro results show that 13C-octanoate is bound to the muffin during microwave cooking and is suitable to trace solid phase gastric emptying.

Determination of Meal Size

The test meal must challenge gastric motility.  The size of the test meal is important because it determines the ability of the test to differentiate individuals with impaired motility from normals.  Electrogastrography (EGG) was employed as an independent measure of gastric motility.  EGG records the gastric myoelectrical activity using cutaneous electrodes.  The half emptying time (T½) was compared to the EGG P/F power ratio obtained for two different sized muffins (250 and 350 calories) in the fasting and postprandial states (1).

The results of the EGG analysis showed that the P/F power ratio was significantly higher with the 350 calorie muffin.  Secondly, T½ was significantly longer for the 350 calorie meal.  Most importantly, the T½ of the 350 calorie meal was significantly correlated with the P/F power ratio (r=0.926, p<0.01).  However, there was no correlation between T½ and the P/F power ratio for the 250 calorie muffin.  These results showed that the 350 calorie muffin meal is able to better stimulate gastric motility than the smaller sized meal.

Comparison to Scintigraphy

A double-labeled muffin study was conducted to determine how well the GMBT correlated with the “gold standard” gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) (2). Added to the muffin mix was 13C-octanoate and technetium-99m sulfur colloid. The meal was ingested also with water labeled with indium-111DTPA. Ten (10) normal subjects (6 females, 4 males; age range: 18-62 years) without gastrointestinal symptoms and twenty-three (23) patients (19 females, 3 males; age range 20-72 years) with dyspeptic symptoms of nausea, vomiting, early satiety, upper abdominal pain and/or discomfort, or abdominal bloating underwent simultaneous GES and the GMBT. Scintigraphic images (anterior and posterior) for Tc-99m and In-111 were obtained with a gamma camera immediately following completion of the meal for four hours. Breath samples were collected every 15 minutes for 6 hours for 13C-carbon dioxide analysis.

Each scintigraphic image obtained was analyzed to determine the gastric counts. The gastric region of interest was manually drawn around the total stomach at each time interval. A geometric mean of the gastric counts was used to correct for depth changes [geometric mean counts = square root (anterior counts x posterior counts)]. The counts were corrected for radioisotope decay. The data was expressed as percent of the initial meal remaining in the stomach versus time and fitted to a modified power exponential function. The breath data was expressed as the percent dose exhaled/hour and cumulative percent of the dose over time. Curves fitted to the percent dose/hour and cumulative percent of dose provided constants to calculate the gastric emptying parameters T½ and Tlag according to the method of Ghoos et al. (3).

In normal subjects, the T½ for the GMBT significantly correlated with T½ solids by GES (r=0.86; p<0.001), but did not correlate with T½ liquids by GES (r=0.08; p=0.83). In dyspeptic patients, the GMBT also significantly correlated with the GES T½ solids (r=0.86; p<0.001) and GES T½ liquids (r=0.75; p<0.001). Combining the data from normal and dyspeptic patients, there was a significant correlation of the GMBT with GES T½ solids (r=0.86; p<0.001). The equation of the regression line for the T½ solids by GMBT is GES = 0.49 x (GMBT) – 1.34. This equation now relates the GMBT to scintigraphy. The approximate doubling of the T½ with the GMBT is due to the processing time of octanoate. We can apply this regression equation to equate the two tests.

Using the upper limit of normal (95% confidence interval), delayed gastric emptying was identified in 7 of 33 subjects by scintigraphy. The sensitivity and specificity of the GMBT to identify delayed gastric emptying was 86% and 96% , respectively.

In conclusion, we found a significant correlation between the GMBT, using an easilyprepared muffin meal and GES of solids. We further showed a strong correlation between the half emptying times of GES with both the muffin meal and the standard egg meal used for scintigraphic gastric emptying studies suggesting that the simple muffin meal is a valid substitute for the egg meal to measure gastric emptying.

Determination of Normal Range of GMBT

One hundred individuals without motility symptoms were administered the GMBT to understand the inter-subject variation and normal range of the test (4).  Using the regression equation found above, we determined that the normal range with the GMBT test was 40 to 90 minutes.  A histogram plot of the results showed a normal distribution.  The Anderson-Darling Normality Test had an A squared value of 0.988 (p=0.013).  The mean for these subjects was 66 minutes with a standard deviation of 11 minutes.  This mean and standard deviation compares favorable to results reported by Ghoos in 42 normals (mean = 72 and SD=22).  The standard deviation for normal motility measured with the GMBT was about half encountered with the egg-based meal.  We attribute this lower variability to the standardization of the GMBT meal and the ease of test administration that minimizes testing protocol deviations and thus improves the reliability of the test.

Normal Distribution of GMBT Test


Click to enlarge figure

Pharmacological Modulation

Pharmacological modulation of gastric emptying to further validate the GMBT has been performed (4).  Two drugs with a known influence on gastrointestinal motor activity were used, erythromycin, which accelerates, and propantheline, which delays gastric emptying.  Forty (40) volunteers were administered a GMBT test to determine T½ rates.  Volunteers were randomly selected to receive 200 mg erythromycin intravenously or 30 mg propantheline orally, just prior to the GMBT.  Erythromycin caused a significant reduction in the gastric half-emptying time.  Propantheline, an anticholinergic drug, significantly delayed gastric half-emptying times.  The results of pharmacological modulation are presented below:

Table 1:  Effect of erythromycin on the GMBT.

Treatment
T½ (min)
Control
69 ± 17
Erythromycin
48 ± 8.7
t test Significance
p<0.0001

Values shown are mean ± standard deviation

Table 2: Effect of propantheline on the GMBT.

Treatment
T½ (min)
Control
69 ± 17
Propantheline
92 ± 38
t test Significance
p=0.0072

Values shown are mean ± standard deviation

These results demonstrate that the GMBT can accurately predict stimulation or delay of modulated gastric emptying by drugs.

Conclusions

These results show a significant correlation between the GMBT and gastric scintigraphy for solids using an easily prepared, low-fat, standardized muffin meal.  The GMBT is both sensitive and specific to delayed gastric emptying in dyspeptic patients.  The GMBT also predicts stimulation or delay of gastric emptying caused by drug administration.  The performance of this test, combined with the significantly decreased cost, decreased test and personnel time, and simpler and more efficient instrumentation requirements, makes the GMBT a very attractive new methodology for assessing gastric motility disorders both in the pharmaceutical industry and ultimately in routine clinical practice.

References

(1) Gonlachanvit, S., W.D. Chey, K.J. Goodman and H.P. Parkman.  Dig. Dis. Sci. 2001; 46:2643-2650.

(2) Bromer, M.Q., S.B. Kantor, D.A. Wagner, L.C. Knight, A.H. Mauer and H.P. Parkman. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2002; 47:1657-1663.

(3) Ghoos, Y.F., B.D. Maes, B. Geypens, G. Mys, M.I. Hiele, P.J. Rutgeerts and G. Vantrappen. Gastroenterology 1993; 104:1640-1647.

(4) Wagner, D.A., D.L. Bolt, K.G. Goodman and M. Rosenberg (unpublished data).

Metabolic Solutions, Inc., 460 Amherst Street, Nashua, NH 03063

Privacy Policy


Key Industry terms: gastric emptying delayed gastric emptying

 
Copyright 2004 Metabolic Solutions Inc. All Rights Reserved.